
Observe ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET’s key takeaways
- I tracked my steps with three well being trackers.
- This included the Apple Watch, Google Pixel Watch, and Oura Ring.
- Of the three trials, the Pixel Watch was essentially the most correct.
Greater than ten years have handed because the first Fitbit arrived to kickstart the step-counting craze, but our collective obsession with hitting that day by day objective hasn’t light.
Utilizing a wearable is a sensible strategy to maintain tabs in your motion and guarantee you do not keep sedentary for too lengthy. Whether or not worn in your wrist or as a hoop, these devices act as fixed nudges to remain lively, utilizing haptic alerts to immediate a stroll or digital dashboards that monitor your momentum in actual time.
Additionally: The best smartwatches of 2026: Expert tested and reviewed
The higher query, although, is: do these step counters truly work? The businesses behind your favourite smartwatch have spent hundreds of thousands of {dollars} on analysis and improvement, honing their step counters and calorie trackers to watch each footstep you’re taking and log it of their working system.
My 3,000-step experiment
I examined the step-tracking performance of my prime three well being trackers to see whether or not they’re as much as snuff. I used the Oura Ring, the Apple Watch Series 11, and the Google Pixel Watch 4 for the job.
To do that, I went to Brooklyn’s Prospect Park and recorded a strolling and working exercise on every machine concurrently. Then, whereas exercising, I counted to 1,000. As soon as I reached 1k, I ended the trackers. I did this twice whereas strolling and as soon as whereas working. I wore all of the trackers on the identical arm
Earlier than we get into the outcomes, I will caveat all of this by saying that my three train trials, whereas useful in understanding how these units evaluate in a real-world setting, had been nowhere close to as intensive because the time and countless trials these corporations have utilized in growing these merchandise. This take a look at just isn’t almost scientific sufficient to be definitive, but it surely’s enjoyable to match.
Easy methods to discover step-tracking on every machine
It is easy to see the general steps taken per day on an Apple Watch, however after testing these three units, I used to be shocked to learn the way troublesome it’s to see what number of steps I took throughout my recorded exercises on the Apple Watch, particularly. Each Oura and Google readily provide this info after you have completed logging a exercise. Merely faucet into the small print of that logged exercise to seek out your steps.
Additionally: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month
However Apple… not a lot. I needed to dig via sub-tabs of Apple’s Well being app — not even the train app — to get this info for my three logged workouts. That is one characteristic I hope Apple pays additional consideration to in future software program updates.
The outcomes
| Stroll | Apple Watch (steps) | Error | Google Pixel (steps) | Error | Oura (steps) | Error |
| Stroll 1 | 977 | −23 | 964 | −36 | 909 | −91 |
| Stroll 2 | 1091 | 91 | 1018 | 18 | 949 | −51 |
| Stroll 3 | 1092 | 92 | 992 | −8 | 1013 | 13 |
| Imply error | 53.3 | 18 | −43.0 | |||
| Imply abs. error | 53.3 | 18 | 51.7* |
*Chart knowledge calculated with assist from Claude.
On the primary strolling trial, Oura recorded 909 steps, the Apple Watch recorded 977 steps, and the Google Pixel Watch recorded 964 steps. On the second trial (the place I ran), Oura recorded 949 steps, Google Pixel recorded 1,018 steps, and Apple Watch recorded 1,091 steps. On the ultimate strolling trial, Oura recorded 1,013 steps, Apple Watch recorded 1,092, and Google Pixel recorded 992 steps.
The well being tracker with the bottom imply absolute error out of those three trials is the Google Pixel Watch 4, which was on common 18 steps off per stroll. Apple Watch got here in second, with a median of 53.3 steps off per stroll, and Oura got here in final, with a median of 56.3 steps off per stroll.
As I mentioned earlier, three trials aren’t sufficient to make any deterministic evaluations. However this fast take a look at reveals the variation in knowledge aggregation throughout these three common health-tracking units.
Author’s verdict
The Google Pixel recorded essentially the most correct steps among the many three units throughout my trials. I’ve already sung the Pixel Watch 4‘s praises, and this fast take a look at provides one other to the checklist. The Oura Ring and Apple Watch are nonetheless aggressive units, and I would nonetheless simply advocate them to iOS customers and anybody bored with buying a smartwatch.
Additionally: I found 4 tech gadgets that actually helped me sleep better (and ditch the alarm)
The Oura Ring 4 is extra often called a common wellness wearable with intensive sleep-tracking and illness-detection options. It is not the only option for exercise monitoring, however latest developments by Oura have improved its step- and activity-tracking algorithms.
The Apple Watch Collection 11 and Google Pixel Watch 4, however, are geared extra towards exercise monitoring, with much less discreet designs for sleep monitoring. I a lot choose the Oura Ring 4 for sleep and the Apple Watch or Pixel Look ahead to train.





